Tuesday, 31 October 2017

Dispelling Educational Myths






TWITTER

@CetNorth
@shslton
@MakingJesusReal
@stjosephsq
@stfblton
@stariverside
@ololdevonport
@harvey_mrs
@tasmadmonk - Fr.Mike Delaney
launcestoncatholicparish.wordpress.com


John Hattie has looked at tens of thousands of studies involving hundreds of millions of students worldwide to analyse a number of myths versus some reality in regards to teaching and learning outcomes.

Some of those are outlined here - What is your response
when you read what Hattie sees as a myth in teaching against what you have experienced?

Myth: Teaching at private schools is better than teaching at public schools

Reality: Professor Hattie says research suggests this is not true. When it comes down to the quality of teachers , it's very, very hard to find evidence that there is any major difference between public and private schools in terms of the growth, the value that teachers add. What really matters is good leadership within a school, and how teachers are selected and developed, no matter whether it is private or government.

Myth: How much you spend on your child's education equates to how well they will do at school

Reality: Evidence shows that it is the quality of teaching that matters most. There is no linear relationship between what you might spend on a child and the education outcome for the child.

Myth: Homework is a necessary evil

Reality: Meta-analysis has shown that the amount of homework a student does in primary school has no effect on student achievement or progress. The research is not saying that there should be no homework, but if schools are going to set homework (which many parents expect) then the focus should be on the type of homework given. Homework does have more effect on results for secondary school. Professor Hattie says what happens in the classroom is what matters most. The worst thing you can do with homework is give young kids projects to do.

Myth: Reducing class size leads to better outcomes for students

Reality: Reducing class size can enhance student achievement but generally the effect is only marginal. What really matters is that the teacher  is effective and having an impact, no matter what size the class is. Professor Hattie says the preoccupation with class size is an enigma; what's really important is that the teacher learns to be an expert in their own class, no matter what size it is.

Myth: We should be happy if our children are 'doing their best'

Reality: Not so. Professor Hattie says telling a student to 'do your best' is the worst thing a teacher or parent can do. Some of the most effective learning happens when teachers ask students what they predict their results will be before a test. Upon establishing a student's expectations of their own abilities, a successful teacher will challenge them by saying they can do better.

Myth: Teachers should be experts on their subjects and do most of the talking in class

Reality: Most teachers talk between 80 and 90% of the time during a lesson. The research has shown that students are more engaged and learn more when teachers talk around 50% of the time, or even less. Evidence shows that children can learn very effectively from their peers; when another student explains concepts to them. The best teachers encourage their students to be active and engaged in the classroom, exploring ideas, and not just passively listening.

Myth: Wearing a school uniform has a positive impact on students' results

Reality: Research has found wearing a uniform has no impact at all on educational outcomes. Professor Hattie says conversations about school uniforms are distracting; it doesn't matter if uniform is compulsory or not as it makes no difference whatsoever to student achievement. A school should decide whether they want to enforce a uniform or not but waste no further time debating it.

Myth: Academic achievement of secondary school students is better at single sex schools

Reality: Professor Hattie says research has found that co-educational school students perform the same as single sex schools.

Myth: Extra-curricular activities distract and diminish school performance

Reality: Professor Hattie says extra-curricular activities are actually powerful in terms of helping children learn. The best predictor of health, wealth and happiness in adult life is not academic achievement at school but the number of years schooled; 

Myth: TV has a negative effect on a child's learning process

Reality: Not directly. Professor Hattie says the problem with a child watching too much television is
that it stops them from spending that time learning in more productive ways, such as by reading or developing their communication and relationship skills.

Myth: A child's birth date can have a negative impact on learning

Reality: Professor Hattie has found that the date which a child's birthday falls in the school year has an effect on their progress initially, as there is a big difference in the ability of a child who is 5 years 1 month as one who is 5 years 11 months. However, no difference is found after two to three years of schooling. What has a more dramatic effect on a child's academic achievements is whether a child makes a friend in their first month at school.

Myth: Children Learn More When They Have 
Control Over Their Learning

 Reality: This is another popular theory that has no grounding in evidence. It's called student-centred and Professor Hattie says it has been blindly accepted by many educators as a good idea. Research shows that giving students control over or choice about what they learn has absolutely no impact on their subsequent results. Interestingly, giving students choices about trivial things (e.g. what colour pen to write in) does have small but positive effect on student outcomes.

Myth: Teachers need to soften criticism with praise

Reality: While giving students positive reinforcement is important, Professor Hattie says coupling critical feedback with praise negates the impact the feedback has on improving student learning. Teachers should work to create a positive, nurturing environment so that students trust their teachers and set hight expectations. However, critical feedback should be delivered with a different tone so students understand the importance of improving their work.

Myth: Repeating struggling or immature students accelerates their learning

Reality: Professor Hattie says repeating a grade actually has a negative effect on student achievement (at every age) and is correlated with negative social and emotional adjustment, behaviour and self-concept. Research has show that struggling students who progress to the next grade often out-perform their peers who have repeated. It should be noted though that academically gifted students who are accelerated forward in a school tend to do it well both socially and academically. Research has shown that academically gifted students have more social problems when they are not accelerated.

Myth: Ability grouping is effective

Reality: Professor Hattie says many educators believe grouping students by ability allows teachers to customise learning to students' learning pace. However the opposite is true - it has little impact on achievement. The greatest negative effect is that students from minorities are more likely to be in the lower ability groups and such equity issues should raise major concerns.

I am sure as you read this you agree and disagree with some aspects of Hattie's research. The strength in this research is the huge volume of studies that have created his 'meta study'. What I hope is still at the forefront of our teaching is to have belief and care in all our students, have interest in them not just their learning and to create a class school environment they are safe in emotionally, physically and mental.




Sacred Heart Launceston Official opening and blessing of buildingsLetting balloons off Grade 6 and Kinder students



Catholic Parents Conference at Croah St Patrick's Launceston


Launceston Company Bitlink working with Our Lady of Mercy Grade 6 students 
programming with an Arduino



Launceston Company Bitlink working with Our Lady of Mercy Grade 6 students 
programming with an Arduino


Launceston Company Bitlink working with Our Lady of Mercy Grade 6 students 
programming with an Arduino


MJR SIGNAGE FROM ACROSS AUSTRALIA
Great to see this in some of our Schools!









Thursday, 12 October 2017

Ipads and nutrients




'Commitment to Catholic Education transcends the lifespan of individuals and generations. We are the beneficiaries of a past where we did not labour and the trustees of a future we will not enjoy. But there is a special reward of participating in an endeavour that is larger than the sum of our individual lives." 

 - J' O' Hare Former President Fordham University, New York

Read the article below in one of the weekend newspapers during the holidays.

"My children love to play outside. They'll run, climb, jump, and splash about all day. They are fascinated by nature; animals and insects, plants and rocks. They have no idea how to unlock an Ipad. Sometimes they watch a bit of television, but overall, they are exempt from the virtual world so many people (children and adults alike) live in today.

Think back to your own childhood. How much time did you spend outside? 

How much time did you spend inside playing with toys, reading, drawing and the like?

Do you know many kids now don't know how to hold a pencil, no idea to use scissors when they reach school? 

Many children today lack basic motor skills, their counterparts possessed five years ago.

Most modern parents are quite happy to hand over the iPad for a few minutes of peace. There are so many other ways that can make this happen.
Just remember whatever you choose, that you are responsible for teaching your child about the world.

Do you want this childhood to be spent on ipads oblivious to the real world around them, or do you want to remember the connection you shared and the fun you had together?"

I have always been earlier adaptor of technology and embrace it in elevating how I operate in my roles.  As a parent with children now 15, 13 and 12 it is increasingly obvious to me of reducing and limiting their use of technology as a replacement for being creative in play, to avoid being bored or replace actual face to face interactions with peers and our own family. When this happens it is also increasingly obvious how their emotions remain more consistent and they are open to spending quality time with other members of our family. 

As educators we can see the children arriving in our Kindergarten classes with increasing gross and fine motor needs, increased social/emotional concerns as well as speech and oral language needs.  


We need to embrace technology and like a healthy diet make sure we have a balance of all the 'nutrients' we need to live a healthy life.

Ripple Effect of MJR Conference

Photos from Mitch showcasing how St Paul's in Rutherford are implementing ideas in their school from this year's MJR Conference:
 Sue & Carla with the 'Affirmation box" where the staff put little affirmations of staff living SOJ and they are put on the notice board in the staff room

 MJR sign at St Paul's Meeting Place

Finger post signs from Cheryl Tilley's presentation have been placed in the prayer garden where staff & students can do their MJR lessons, reflections and RE

Teachers from 3 schools meeting at St Paul's talking and discussing MJR and how they hope to implement it in the future

Photos from the recent North and North West 

Network Meetings